Editorial Policy
Oxytocin.org is committed to scientific accuracy, transparency, and editorial independence. This policy outlines the standards we apply to every piece of content published on this site – from how we select and verify sources to how we handle corrections and maintain our independence from commercial interests.
Research Standards
All articles on Oxytocin.org are grounded in peer-reviewed research published in recognised scientific journals. We draw on original research papers, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and authoritative textbooks in neuroscience, neuroendocrinology, and related disciplines. We do not cite press releases, blog posts, or non-peer-reviewed preprints as primary evidence, though we may reference preprints when clearly labelled as such and when they address emerging topics of significant public interest.
Our content spans the full breadth of oxytocin science – from molecular pharmacology and receptor genetics to clinical trials and behavioural research. Across all topics, we apply the same standard: claims must be supported by published evidence, and the strength of that evidence must be communicated honestly.
Source Verification
We prioritise primary sources – the original research papers in which findings were first reported. When summarising a body of work, we identify the researchers by name, specify the journal and year of publication, and describe the study design in sufficient detail for readers to evaluate the evidence themselves.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses receive particular emphasis because they synthesise evidence across multiple studies, providing a more reliable picture than any single experiment. Where findings are contested or have failed to replicate, we say so. Science is a process, not a collection of settled facts, and our writing reflects that reality.
We do not cherry-pick studies to support a predetermined narrative. When the evidence is mixed, we present both sides. When a finding is preliminary, we label it clearly. Readers deserve to know not just what researchers have found, but how confident they should be in those findings.
Content Review Process
Every article published on Oxytocin.org undergoes review for scientific accuracy, clarity, and completeness before publication. Our process includes:
- Fact-checking – all statistical claims, researcher attributions, and study descriptions are verified against the original published sources
- Currency review – articles are checked against recent literature to ensure they reflect the current state of the field
- Clarity editing – scientific content is edited for accessibility without sacrificing precision, ensuring that general readers can follow the material while specialists find it accurate
- Update monitoring – published articles are periodically reviewed and updated when significant new research emerges or when errors are identified
Articles display their most recent update date, so readers can assess how current the information is. When substantive changes are made to a published article, we note the nature of the update.
Editorial Independence
Oxytocin.org operates with complete editorial independence. We receive no funding, sponsorship, or support from pharmaceutical companies, supplement manufacturers, or any commercial entity with a financial interest in oxytocin products or therapies.
No external organisation has editorial input into our content. Our writers and reviewers are not compensated by, or affiliated with, companies that manufacture or sell oxytocin-related products. This independence is non-negotiable – it is the foundation upon which our credibility rests.
We do not accept paid content, sponsored articles, or advertorial material. We do not participate in affiliate marketing for health products. If our funding model ever changes, we will disclose it transparently on this page.
Author Attribution
Content on Oxytocin.org is written and reviewed by science writers with subject-matter expertise in neuroscience, pharmacology, and related fields. Our contributors have experience translating complex scientific research into accurate, accessible prose for general audiences.
We believe that the quality of our content speaks for itself. Our commitment is to rigorous, well-sourced science writing that meets the standards expected by both general readers and subject-matter experts.
Medical Disclaimer
Oxytocin.org provides educational content about oxytocin research. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendation. The information presented here is intended to inform and educate – it is not a substitute for professional medical guidance.
If you are considering oxytocin-based therapies or have questions about how oxytocin research may relate to your health, please consult a qualified healthcare professional. Do not start, stop, or modify any treatment based on information found on this website.
Corrections Policy
We are committed to correcting errors promptly and transparently. If we discover – or are informed of – a factual error, outdated claim, or misleading statement in any of our articles, we will:
- Correct the error as quickly as possible
- Note the correction and its date within the article
- Preserve transparency about what was changed and why
We do not silently alter published content. Readers who relied on earlier versions of an article have a right to know what has changed.
If you believe you have identified an error in any article on Oxytocin.org, please contact us with specific details, including the article in question and, where possible, a reference to the correct information. We take every correction request seriously and aim to respond within a few working days.
Contact
For questions about our editorial standards, to report errors, or to suggest improvements, please contact us.